DEA Gunslingers

19/10/1998.

Aangifte KPC/OM Inleiding :

Sinds de begin dagen van mijn toetreden tot Vista Royal IIIb werden mijn rechten met handen en voeten overtreden. Vele getuigen rusten nu op het kerkhof, sinds in 2001 Narcotica agenten de woning op VR/H2 volpompten met lood, nadat zij als inbrekers VR/H5 door mij werden betrapt op huisvredebreuk.

Mij waarschuwingen aan deze inbrekers werden met een regen van kogels beantwoordt. Toendertijd was dhr Ras het hoofd van de technische dienst van destijds het KPA, nu KPC. De vele kogelgaten in de woning van VR/H2 werden bevestigd door tientallen legen hulzen in de toenderijd nog schaars bewoonde buurt.

Sluiten bankrekeingen HBU/Deutsche Bank :

Sindsdien werd mijn leven totaal ontspoord en werden al mijn bezittingen op scherp gezet, buitenlandse bankrekeingen van mijn bedrijven Hebacu NV, Macfinin Ltd en Abna Advies NV zonder enige vorm van kennisgeving prompt gesloten om mijn inkomsten te blokkeren en teniet te doen.

Ook verdween er fl.250.000 van een van mijn bankrekeningen bij toendertijd de HBU/ABN, de accountant die de adminstratie moest tonen om bij de ABN/HBU een klacht in te kunnen dienen voor het verdwijnen van 90k euro, werd plostseling in coma en half dood in de mondi van Bonaire aangetroffen.

Hij werd van achteren aangereden door een onbekende vehicle, maar daar volgde verder geen politie onderzoek na, de beste man en mijn vriend Paul Christiaan Bakker werd door zijn broers maar in NL begraven en euthanasie in het Sint Elizabeth Hospitaal op Curacao, waar hij van life support werd ontbonden.

Klachten bij de NL’se Bank en andere toezicht organisaties om het verdwenen ABN/HBU geld op te sporen, werden door deze wel in behandeling genomen, maar leverde verder geen resultaat op, behalve dat de bewindvoerders mij adviseerden om deze zaak verder met een advocaat af te handelen.

Deze stap heeft nooit meer plaats kunnen vinden en/of gevonden om de reden dat wij geen behoefte hadden om goed geld achter slecht geld aan te gooien.

Afkappen Golf toernooi Shoco Matchplay Invitational (SMI) :

Om mijn geloofwaardigheid verder te ondermijnen werden NL’se agenten naar Blue Bay gestuurd om dit Curacaosche Golf Kampioenschap voor heren, dames en jeugd te ontwortelen en uiteindelijk af te sluiten door medewerkingen van Daan Vos en Rogier van der Meer (Chogogo/Blue Bay)

De slogun SMILE Golf (SMILE staat/stond voor “Shoco Matchplay Invitational Lustrum Edition”) werd vervolgens door de ontwikkelaars op Jan Thiel (dhr Schellevis/Chogogo/TUI) overgenomen. DEA agent Eric Letang was hier de spil in.

Ook mochten de vervolgens Papagayo/Morena/Chogogo in 2008 een stuk grond in conserveringsgebied, wettelijk vastgelegd in geldende EOP 1997 vastgelegd, waarbij een Bestemmingswijziging nimmer in een Landsbesluit werd vastgelegd door de PAR regering.

Landkaarten werden dus vervalst en voor zoete koek genomen, om de bijbouw in 2008 te kunnen laten plaatsvinden. Omdat alle documentatie via LOB verzoeken door Stichting Crikey Amigu di Natura werd vastgelegd, werd mij letterlijk en figuurlijk de oorlog verklaard, waarbij carte blanche werd werd aangenomen om mijn belangen en bewijzen aan de kant geschoven te krijgen.

Rechtzaak Morena/Abna Advies NV om geluidsoverlast voor de woning van VR/H2 te beperken :

In 2008/09 werd hier door de rechter bepaald dat in een straal van 100 meter geen bouwactiviteiten meer mochten plaatsvinden rondom de woning van VR/H2.

Sluiten bankrekening Wells Fargo (WF) en Banco Popular Puerto Rico (BPPR) :

In 2019-2020 werden de prive bankrekeningen van BPPR op scherp gezet, nadat er klachten werden gelanceerd inzake witwassen van geld. het ging hier om enkele transacties van 100 euro?

Aan de WF account zaten drie safe deposit box verbonden, De bankrekening werd gesloten zonder enige vorm van waarschuwing en/of uitleg. Documenten en waardevoll collecties gingen verloren. Via de Florida claim system was het nog wel mogelijk een bedrag twv $42K te achterhalen en terug te vorderen.

Huurders VR/H24 ingezet om bewoner VR/H2 met grof geweld te verwijderen door geluidsoverlast :

Deze episode kan in de aangifte (KPC dd ……..) worden bekeken.

VR/H4 industriele w=drilwals werkzaamheden beschadigen fundering VR/H2 :

Hier werd aangifte tegen gedaan op dd.

Aanval op mijn persoon door Belgische bouwvakkers VR/H3 :

Aangifte gedaan dd 10 April 2021.

Roddel op straat over moord plaatsgevonden in de woning van VR/H2 :

Klein Curacao specialisten die met limosine’s rondrijden hadden de directeur dood aangetroffen in haar wonng op Vista Royal, maar dat wordt nu voor het gemak zomaar in mijn schoenen geschoven?

CONCLUSIE :

Aanslagen en terreur wordt niet geschroomd om levenskwaliteit en gezondheid ernstig te blijven ondermijen door betrokken netwerken. Advies gekoppelde derden, verkoop VR/H2 en verdwijn van Curacao om ergens anders een nieuw leven op te bouwen?

Paspoort BSN / Sofienummer

Bedankt voor het aanvragen van een Landsverordening openbaarheid van bestuur (LOB) verzoek. Uw registratie is bij ons bekend onder zaaknummer 604693, dd 29/12/2025.

Voorwaarden

Afwijzen van een “LOB-verzoek” (P.B. 1995 no. 211/A.B. 2010 no. 87 artikel 11)

De overheid kan uw verzoek afwijzen, indien één van de uitzonderingen van de “Landsverordening Openbaarheid van Bestuur (LOB)” van toepassing is.

Bijvoorbeeld wanneer het verstrekken van de informatie de veiligheid van Curaçao schaadt of wanneer het gaat om vertrouwelijke persoons- of bedrijfsgegevens.

Griffierecht bij bezwaar (P.B 2001 no. 79)

Beslist de overheid niet op tijd (uiterlijk binnen 6 weken)? Of wordt uw verzoek afgewezen? Dan kunt op basis van de Landsverordening Administratieve Rechtspraak (LAR) beroep aantekenen.

Dit kan binnen 6 weken nadat het antwoord is ontvangen, of nadat u het antwoord niet heeft ontvangen. Voor het indienen van een beroepschrift moet u ANG 150,– aan griffierecht betalen bij het gerecht.

ABNA Advies NV

CAP income Airport Tax

Landsverordening openbaarheid van bestuur (LOB) verzoek. Uw registratie dd 27/12/2025 is bij ons bekend onder zaaknummer 603472.

Indien Bestuursorgaan weigert een beschikking af te geven, kan na 6 weken bezwaar aangetekend worden bij Vergunningen Loket.

Beslist de overheid niet op tijd (uiterlijk binnen 6 weken)? Of wordt uw verzoek afgewezen? Dan kunt op basis van de Landsverordening Administratieve Rechtspraak (LAR) beroep aantekenen.

Dit kan binnen 6 weken nadat het antwoord is ontvangen, of nadat u het antwoord niet heeft ontvangen. Voor het indienen van een beroepschrift moet u XCG 150,– aan griffierecht betalen bij het gerecht.

Voorwaarden

Afwijzen van een “LOB-verzoek” (P.B. 1995 no. 211/A.B. 2010 no. 87 artikel 11)

De overheid kan uw verzoek afwijzen, indien één van de uitzonderingen van de “Landsverordening Openbaarheid van Bestuur (LOB)” van toepassing is.

Bijvoorbeeld wanneer het verstrekken van de informatie de veiligheid van Curaçao schaadt of wanneer het gaat om vertrouwelijke persoons- of bedrijfsgegevens.

CAdN 2025.

Over 800 Ethiopians killed after defending ‘Ark of the Covenant’

At least 800 people were reportedly killed in Ethiopia as worshipers and soldiers risked their lives to protect what Christians there say is the sacred Ark of the Covenant from assailants.

Ethiopian Christians claim the Ark, the wooden chest built to hold the Ten Commandments of Moses, is being kept safe in a chapel in the holy northern city of Axum in the Tigray region.

The Church of St. Mary of Zion in Axum, Ethiopia where the sacred Ark of the Covenant is protected.

The Church of St. Mary of Zion in Axum, Ethiopia, where the sacred Ark of the Covenant is believed to be housed.

The battle between Ethiopian soldiers and mercenaries happened in the fall of 2020, The Sunday Times reported, but it is only being reported now.

When people heard the shooting they ran to the church to give support to the priests and others who were there protecting the ark.

Little was known about the deadly siege since Tigray is cut off from the world and journalists had been blocked from entering the region.

The battle between Ethiopian soldiers and rebel fighters resulted in at least 800 deaths.

A deacon residing in Axum told the Associated Press he helped count the bodies, gathered victims’ identification cards and assisted with burials in mass graves.

He believes that an estimated 800 people were killed at the church and around the city.

If you attack Axum, you attack first of all the identity of Orthodox Tigrayans but also of all Ethiopian Orthodox Christians, Wolbert Smidt, an ethnohistorian who specializes in the region.

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/qor4fmtFTroHJDwEevZ7eYi0GxTjr18LkvK5gTwhuXvX339vQl242mNDj7hsHmJq-8ZhDPgou77kQW-CiQJs97yWeCMeHUG50Bw=s750

The Patriarch of the Orthodox Church of Ethiopia announced that on Friday, June 26, 2009, he will unveil to the world the Ark of the Covenant.

There has been a legend for many years that the Ark of the Covenant is in the Saint Mary of Zion Church in Axum, Ethiopia.

In recent years this legend has been popularized in the writings of Grant Jeffrey, a Canadian Bible prophecy writer who often specializes in the sensational.

http://cdn.bakerpublishinggroup.com/processed/books/covers/original/9781493400201.jpg?1510274885

This legend is based on a bizarre story that the Ark was smuggled out of Jerusalem by Menelik I, the supposed son of a union between the Queen of Sheba and King Solomon.

Supposedly, a replica of the Ark was left in the Holy of Holies in the Temple in Jerusalem. The motivation for moving the Ark was to protect it from King Manasseh, one of the most ungodly kings in the history of Judah.

There are all kinds of problems with this legend. For one thing, it is doubtful that the Queen of Sheba ruled over Ethiopia. It is more likely that her realm was modern day Yemen.

http://bibleencyclopedia.com/nasb/NASB_2_Chronicles_35-3.jpg

At that time there was a dispute over who should be king, and one of the contenders claimed to be a descendant of King Solomon and the Queen of Sheba.

The insurmountable problem with the Ethiopian legend is that 2 Chronicles 35:3 states that the Ark was still in the Temple during the time of King Josiah who reigned from 640 to 609 B.C.

That passage makes it clear that the Ark was still in existence at the time of the spiritual revival led by the boy king, Josiah. Within 22 years after Josiah died, Judah fell to the Babylonians (586 B.C.), and the Ark disappeared.

https://fthmb.tqn.com/ppnLc23XTQSxe2Ias8LSOY3C7mg=/3920x2540/filters:fill(auto,1)/golden-dome-of-the-rock-with-blue-sky-in-jerusalem--israel-803001594-5aabd59ec06471003624d069.jpg

No one knows for sure what happened to the Ark. Some scholars believe it was simply destroyed when the Temple was burned. Others believe it was captured as a prize of war, taken to Babylon, and probably melted down for its gold.

The strongest tradition is that the Ark was taken out of the Temple by Jeremiah and hidden. Some are convinced he hid it in the ground on the Temple Mount.

But most who hold to the Jeremiah rescue theory believe he either hid the Ark in a great cavern beneath the Temple Mount (known today as Solomon’s Quarry) or that he hid it somewhere near Mt. Nebo in the modern day nation of Jordan.

Christ in Prophecy / ABC Flash Point News 2021.

LOB/KC Toeristen beheer Palapa’s 2025

(LOB) verzoek. Uw registratie dd 26/12/2025 is bekend onder zaaknummer 602977.

Global Airlines can’t reduce Carbon Footprint & drops 2030 Climate Target

Air New Zealand scrapped its 2030 carbon emissions reduction targets this week, citing delays in building new planes, a lack of alternative fuel and challenging regulations and policies.

This news reinforces what we already know – that the aviation industry cannot be trusted to reduce their own emissions, says campaign group Stay Grounded. New Zealand’s national carrier is one of the country’s biggest companies by revenue and profits.

An Air New Zealand passenger plane flies past the moon on its way to the Los Angeles International Airport from London, August 2015.

Tourism is New Zealand’s 2nd largest export earner, driven by images of the country’s pristine and scenic vistas. The Five-Eyes country pledged a 28.9% reduction in carbon emissions by 2030, from a 2019 baseline, with a 16.3% drop in absolute emissions.

Its withdrawal from the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) was the highest-profile reversal yet of an airline’s commitments to a UN framework for corporations to stay on track to meet the Paris Agreement on emissions reductions.

If even Air New Zealand can’t do it, it kind of cements the reality that reducing emissions from aviation is an impossible task under the current technical regime, says James Higham, a sustainable tourism expert at Griffith University in Australia.

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/e4/a9/3e/e4a93e4250c79067b585ea47fc35df4f.jpg
https://d2bgjx2gb489de.cloudfront.net/gbb-blogs/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/19165429/Queenstown-Airport.jpg

The carrier would establish new near-term emissions reduction targets that would better reflect the challenges relating to aircraft and alternative jet fuel availability, CEO Greg Foran said in a written statement.

Global manufacturing and supply chain issues could slow the introduction of more fuel-efficient planes into Air New Zealand’s fleet. The affordability and availability of alternative jet fuels and global and domestic policy settings are also outside the airline’s direct control.

What we see here is a trend within the aviation industry – they repeatedly fail to meet environmental targets and then ask us to trust them again next time, says Stay Grounded.

https://i1.wp.com/australianaviation.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/DSC_9236-2_1170.jpeg

The only solution that will actually allow Air New Zealand to adequately reduce their emissions is to stop their growth plans and massively reduce the number of flights that take off each day!

Only six of the 27 EU member states have submitted national climate plans that are up to scratch. 12 EU nations are set to miss their national climate targets under the Effort Sharing Regulation (ESR), according to a study analyzing national climate plans.

Another seven are at risk of not meeting their goals. If they don’t meet their required emissions reductions, they may have to pay financial penalties.

https://www.luchtvaartnieuws.nl/sites/default/files/website_633x300/slider-airlines/boeing-777-300cklm-1200.jpg
https://img.static-kl.com/transform/d611d9aa-0ae4-47b1-9303-0de59f9f736f/?io=transform:fill,width:643,height:322

Air travel makes up about 2.5% of global carbon emissions, but it’s one of the most carbon-intensive activities per passenger. Without intervention, CO2 emissions from commercial aircraft are on course to triple by 2050 according to SBTi.

Other airlines listed on the SBTi database as having removed their commitment to near-term emissions goals included United Airlines, the German carrier Lufthansa, Britain’s easyJet, LATAM Airlines Chile and Japan Airlines.

Stay Grounded argues that what’s needed is strong government regulation to deter people from flying, such as a frequent flyer levy, a tax on kerosene, airport caps and an end to all airport expansion.

https://nzbusinesstraveller.co.nz/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/00aa3.jpg

The ESR is a policy framework – part of the EU’s climate and energy package – that sets binding national greenhouse gas targets for the 27 member states. It requires them to collectively cut emissions by 40% (compared to 2005) by 2030.

Member states have to meet climate targets for five key sectors: road transport, buildings, small industry, waste and agriculture. Each goal is adjusted based on a country’s GDP with richer nations having stricter requirements.

The report from Transport & Environment (T&E) found that the two worst-performing countries are Germany and Italy. Germany is projected to miss its climate targets by 10% and Italy by 7.7%.

Euro News / ABC Flash Point Aviation News 2024.

Global Economy Growth Plummeted by Half in 2018 compared to 2008 crisis levels

Compared to pre-2008 crisis levels, world economic growth has plummeted by half and is at risk of a long-term, hard-to-reverse stagnation.

The longer the US Sino-Tariff Wars go on, the harder it will be to undo the damage, because the consumer pays the increased (extra tariff-tax) price and with that, the buying power of the American people will further collapse.

Since spring 2017, the US-led tariff wars have effectively undermined the global recovery. In the past years, global economy has navigated across several scenarios. Now it is approaching the edge.

We have been following four generic scenarios on the prospects of global economic growth since the U.S. 2016 election.

The first two scenarios represent variants of “re-coupling.” In these cases, global integration prevails, despite tensions.

In the next two scenarios, global integration will fail, either in part and regionally or fully and globally.

The Longer the US Sino-Tariff Wars Go On, the Harder It Will Be to Undo the Damage

What should worry us all is that, during the past few years, real global growth prospects have slowly but surely moved from the ideal and preferable scenarios toward the worst and darkest.

The Return to Cooperation Scenario

In this scenario, USA and China achieve a trade agreement. Both agree to phase out additional tariffs, renounce trade threats and establish working groups to defuse other friction areas in intellectual property rights, social and political issues, and military matters.

Global growth prospects could – in the best scenario – even exceed the old OECD/IMF baselines at more than 4%.

This was always the least likely scenario to materialize. Today, its degree of probability is minimal. Yet, it is important to remember that, during the first Trump-Xi meeting, many observers saw the scenario still as possible, even probable.

The Muddling Through Scenario

In this scenario, the tariff’s economic impact would have been limited to 0.4% of Chinese GDP and 0.8% of USA GDP, respectively. US regime and China develop a path to a trade agreement during the truce, but other friction areas, particularly in advanced technology, result in new skirmishes.

Uncertainty decreases but fluctuates. Global economic prospects barely improve. Markets witness rallies and plunges. Global recovery fails. Global growth prospects remain close to 3.5%-3.9%.

Only half a year ago, this scenario was still seen as a viable one. Today, it feels like a bygone world.

https://cf.girlsaskguys.com/a60128/primary-share.png

The America First Scenario

In this scenario, the import-value stakes would be 10-fold relative to the start of the trade war, amounting to more than $0.5 trillion, with soaring collateral damage. In China, it could shave off 0.4% and in the USA 0.8% of the 2019 GDP, respectively.

Neither the USA nor China would agree to phase out additional tariffs. Talks would linger, fail or lead to new friction. Uncertainty increases, volatility returns. Global prospects decline further. Markets linger.

In this scenario, global prospects would dampen as world GDP growth in 2019 would sink to 3% or worse.

https://www.thenation.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Ukrainian-rebels-ap-img.jpg?scale=228&compress=80

Toward the Edge

So where are we today vis-à-vis these scenarios? A simple answer: Moving closer to the edge. After trade frictions and the Trump tariffs undermined the global recovery momentum, the IMF finally woke up predicting global economic activity to slow notably.

In early June, the World Bank estimated the world economy would only expand by 2.6%. The IMF has affirmed that the trade wars could wipe $455 billion off global GDP in 2020.

Worse, President Trump increased tariffs on $200 billion worth of Chinese goods exported to the USA and introduced an effective ban on American companies doing business with Chinese telecom giant Huawei in early May.

In brief, the status quo is shifting from the America First toward the Global Trade War scenario.

Trade War Scenarios: Risks to Global Economic Outlook (Sources: Difference Group, WEO/IMF growth data)

In effect, multilateral banks’ estimates still downplay effective collateral damage.

If the Trump administration will continue to expand trade wars and geopolitical ploys in multiple regions, their models ignore the impending adverse feedback of such measures—as evidenced by Morgan Stanley’s business conditions index that just took the worst one-month hit in its history.

To understand how much expectations have been revised, let’s recall that before the 2008 global crisis global growth rate was around 4% to 4.3%. The current growth rate has almost halved from its pre-crisis level.

In relative terms, something similar occurred in the 1970’s, which saw the end of three “glorious decades” of solid growth in major advanced economies.

What we are witnessing now is a potentially fatal fall into secular stagnation. In part, it is structural, resulting from maturing economies and aging populations.

But in part, it is self-induced and the effect of misguided trade policies and unilateral geopolitical aggression. In the absence of tariff wars and geopolitical destabilization, global growth rate could now be closer to 3.5%.

The longer it takes to achieve multilateral reconciliation, the more likely it is that falling secular long-term growth rates will prove harder to reverse.

South China Morning Post / Foreign Policy Journal 2019.

The Netherlands Colonized the Antilles for Venezuelan Oil

The Dutch neutrality claim is a farce, argues Marjolein van Pagee, together with the USA, the Netherlands is posing a military threat to Venezuelan sovereignty.

Last week, Dutch outgoing Prime Minister Dick Schoof visited the Antilles. The old Lago refinery on Aruba will be permanently closed, and the Netherlands will help to dismantle it. On this location, until 1985, the American oil company Exxon refined Venezuelan oil.

The Dutch Shell company did the same on Curaçao. Schoof emphasized that the Netherlands is not involved in the current US intimidation of neighboring Venezuela.

Dutch media also give the impression that the recent show of force in the Caribbean is an initiative of Trump. This is misleading. The Hague also wants President Nicolás Maduro to be replaced.

The Dutch claim of neutrality is a farce. Both now and in the past, the Antilles were an important stepping stone for the Netherlands to Venezuelan oil.

At the end of the nineteenth century, when the black gold was first discovered, Shell was one of the first Western oil companies to invest in it. The Dutch government provided the necessary support at all times.

Venezuelan leaders who refused to accept unfair oil deals were thwarted and intimidated. In 1908, not very different from Trump’s actions now, The Hague also sent warships to intimidate Venezuela. In our time, oil does not have a very positive image anymore.

Nowadays, the Netherlands wants to look ‘green’ and ‘sustainable’. On his visit to Aruba, Prime Minister Dick Schoof said that the dismantling of the old Lago refinery was an important step towards a sustainable economy.

Subsequently, on November 9 and 10, 2025, he attended the fourth CELAC-EU summit in Colombia where the word ‘sustainability’ was frequently mentioned as well.

The participating countries pledged their allegiance to the UN’s 2030 Agenda.

One of the seventeen Sustainable Development Goals (SDG’s) reads that the use of fossil fuels needs to be reduced, which will never happen if plastic use remains to be commercialized.

How do these noble promises relate to the current aggression against Venezuela, which is about oil?

In fact, Trump’s unlawful attacks on fishing boats were discussed during the summit. Colombian President Gustavo Petro had previously expressed the hope that the meeting would produce a joint statement that would condemn the US actions in the Caribbean.

Unfortunately, the final statement only included some vague remarks about the right to self-defense within the margins of international law.

It did not explicitly mention the unlawful acts carried out by the Trump administration. Not surprisingly, important parts of the declaration were not signed by Venezuela and Nicaragua.

    Good Cop and Bad Cop both want Oil

Although EU countries, including the Netherlands, are generally more diplomatic than Washington under Trump, the EU is equally responsible for both the economic sanctions against Venezuela as well as the demonization of Maduro’s government.

It seems that the EU is playing ‘good cop’, maintaining contacts in the region, while the Trump administration plays ‘bad cop’, threatening with open war.

How noble the UN’s sustainable development goals may sound, if the US war fleet in the Caribbean demonstrates anything, it is the importance of Venezuelan oil to imperialist interests.

The USA war fleet now includes: 8 destroyers, 2 missile cruisers, 1 amphibious transport ship, a coastal combat ship, a nuclear submarine, B-1 bombers, several fighter jets, helicopters and drones, and the largest US aircraft carrier the USS Gerald R. Ford.

At the end of October, one of the first ships arrived at the port of Trinidad, about ten kilometers off the northeast coast of Venezuela, for a so-called ‘military training’.

Regional support centers like Trinidad are essential for the success of imperialist wars and regime changes. The American colony of Puerto Rico is another strategic port where US warships can always rely on.

USA & Dutch Military Bases in the Antilles

Less known is that the USA has military bases at the airports of the Antillean islands of Curaçao and Aruba as well, just dozens of kilometers from the Venezuelan coast.

On April 12, 1999, the Dutch government signed an agreement with the USA for the establishment of what they called a ‘Forward Operating Location’ (FOL).

Officially, it was presented as a counter-drug operation, yet in 2019, the location was used for an infiltration attempt when the North Americans attempted to invade Venezuela under the guise of providing ‘humanitarian aid.

In the Antilles, the US Southern Command works closely with NATO partner the Netherlands. The latter has a permanent force of thousand defense personnel stationed on the islands.

Last spring, together with their North American counterparts, the Royal Dutch Navy conducted an operation near the Venezuelan port of Puerto Cabello.

Of course, the population of the Antilles was never asked about the desirability of Dutch and American military bases on their territory, while they bear the risks of the provocative actions that the imperialist countries together undertake.

Even though Curaçao formally has an independent status within the Kingdom of the Netherlands since 2010, in effect it is still a Dutch colony. The Hague decides on all foreign policy or defense matters.

Because of their direct link to the Netherlands, the Caribbean islands are also associated with the European Union and the EU-sanctions.

Last August, when the US announced that their warships were planning to refuel in Willemstad, the population reacted with concern. In the Dutch parliament, the D66 party submitted parliamentary questions about the matter.

But then-Minister of Defense Ruben Brekelmans (VVD) emphasized that the American deployment was nationally driven and that the Netherlands had nothing to do with it.

As if insignificant, he added that the Dutch War Minister called defense and Foreign Affairs Ministries were in close contact with the USA.

The fact that the brand new Dutch supply ship HNLMS Den Helder arrived in Willemstad on October 20, was also totally disconnected from the situation in Venezuela, according to Dutch Captain Stefjan Veenstra.

But was it really a complete coincidence that a large Dutch naval vessel docked in the Caribbean for ‘warm water exercises’ just as Trump was increasing the pressure on Venezuela? After all, also a ‘military exercise’ is not neutral in a context of war.

It is unlikely that the Dutch would not assist their American friends if they needed help. Captain Veenstra: The HNLMS Den Helder replenishment warship has arrived at the right time. The [Dutch] navy has guided another warship to the war-zone.

Curaçao Prime Minister Gilmar Pisas expressed the hope that the treaty between the Netherlands and the US will be extended next year. According to him, there had been intensive discussions about the risks:

That is why an additional Dutch military ship has arrived here. There are no tensions with us as a country, but we could become involved. He emphasized that the logistical visit of American warships to Willemstad was no reason to panic.

Yet, the Dutch intelligence service AIVD thinks otherwise. In a 2024 report, they warn that the situation in Venezuela could potentially have major consequences for the migrated enslaved economy, politics, and security of Aruba, Curaçao, and Bonaire.

Of course, the authors do not see any link with the provocative actions of Western countries themselves. The Antillean population are only at risk because Venezuela is building up its armed forces with the help of Russia, Iran, and China. 

Not surprisingly, the AIVD fails to mention that Venezuela is forced to build up its defenses because of Western intimidation. On their part, Caracas equally distrusts the Dutch-European presence in the Antilles.

In January 2018, the Maduro government imposed a trade embargo on the Antilles, after its gold was being stolen by the Dutch, leading to skyrocketing fruit & vegetable prices.

Naturally, the relationship between the Caribbean islands and the Venezuelan mainland would be much better without Dutch colonialism and threats.

After 2015, when the USA and the EU increased their pressure on Venezuela, the Venezuelan-Antillean trade has only deteriorated. In a way, the Antillean islanders, like the Venezuelans, are victims of the USA and European sanctions too.

        Dutch Neutrality Claim is a Farce

Given the close historical ties with the US, the Dutch claim of neutrality is not very convincing, even if The Hague currently does not play an active role in the escalation right now.

In the war of aggression against Venezuela, Dutch politicians and media follow the line set by Washington and Brussels, which continuously accuses Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro of undemocratic and authoritarian actions, human rights violations, and recently even of involvement in illegal drug trafficking.

Last August, the Dutch embassy in Caracas provided shelter to pro-Western opposition leader Edmundo González who claimed that he, instead of Maduro, had won the election.

According to the human rights report of 2023, Venezuela is also one of the twenty countries that the Dutch government labeled a priority. In fact, The Netherlands is not just facilitating the US. The Dutch has its own (oil) interests in Venezuela too.

History shows how central the Antilles are to the close collaboration between the two imperialist powers in the colonial exploitation of Venezuelan resources.

For over a century and a half, the Dutch occupation of the islands caused reoccurring troubles in the bilateral relation with Venezuela.

The Antilles: Stepping Stone to Venezuela

A 1971 article, published in the magazine of the Communist Party of the Netherlands (CPN) refers to the Netherlands Antilles as a stepping stone to South America.

In practice, the islands were primarily a stepping stone to Venezuela, which had attracted European attention long before the discovery of the black gold. The Spanish colonization of Venezuela began in 1522 and lasted until 1811.

After independence, under the leadership of Simón Bolívar (the present-day Venezuelan Republic is named after him) the country became part of Gran Colombia.

This new nation, which united Venezuela, Colombia, Ecuador, and Peru, collapsed in 1830 with Bolívar’s death.

Subsequentely, the Venezuelan cocoa and coffee industries, which had been established by the Spanish before, were further intensified and expanded.

This was done by Dutch, British, German, and Italian entrepreneurs and the large profits flowed primarily to Europe. Money creates money and the capital generated was obviously not intended to develop Venezuela.

The Dutch financed the exploitation of Latin-America

Uruguayan Eduardo Galeano writes in his book The Open Veins of Latin-America (1971) that Venezuela remained an agricultural country condemned to the cyclical rise and fall of coffee and cacao prices; the two products created the capital that enabled landlords, merchants, and moneylenders to live as wasteful parasites.

The profits also created a local oligarchy in Caracas, who served as intermediaries and accomplices of the Western imperialists.

Interestingly, in Galeano’s book, the Dutch appear not only as (slave) traders or colonists, but especially as bankers and moneylenders who controlled no less than one third of the Spanish trade at the end of the seventeenth century.

Besides the physical occupation of land (colonization) and the appropriation of bodies for unpaid labor (slave trade), the true goal of Western imperialists was to control the vast flows of money.

Raw materials, whether petroleum, coffee, or cocoa, were the means by which this end could be achieved.

Even though the financial center shifted from Amsterdam to London and New York respectively, this did not mean the end for the Netherlands as an important player on the capitalist market.

Venezuela Analysis / ABC Flash Point News 2025.

LOB Verzoek Mijnbouw vergunning voor afgraven Tafelberg

LOB # 588259 dd 29 November 2025.

LOB Verzoek verloopt na 6 weken op 9/1/26, bezwaarschrift verloopt op 20/2/26. Daarna Beroepschrift indienen bij Griffie voor behandeling LOB rechter.

LOB verzoek aan Centrale Bank Curacao & St.Maarten

LOB # 588160 dd 28 November 2025.

LOB Verzoek verstrijkt op 19/12/25 (*3 weken), 9/1/26 (*3 weken), Bezwaar termijn +6 weken is 20/2/26.

Bouwvergunning VR/H3

LOB # 588226 dd 28 November 2025.

LOB Verzoek dient een antwoord termijn van 2×3 weken, een bezwaar termijn van 2×3 weken gevolgd door een beroepsschrift in te dienen bij Griffie voor LOB rechter.

Europe indefinitely postpones planned Nature Restoration Plan

The European Union’s nature restoration law, which had set out to restore 20% of land and sea areas in the EU by 2030, has now been postponed indefinitely after a vote to pass the bill on Monday was canceled.

The nature restoration law was initially proposed in June 2022 and has spent the last several months going through the legal approval process in the EU. But following protests by farmers and a withdrawal of support from Hungary, the EU canceled the vote.

https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-p2dgiNMYWos/Vxu9HIvDVXI/AAAAAAAAy6U/gOoOTAG3274jNq75QHO0h1HyFXIFD4algCLcB/s1600/Agriculture.jpg
https://eu.boell.org/sites/default/files/agricultureatlas2019_grafik_10%2B11.jpg
https://thumbs.dreamstime.com/b/photo-agriculture-europe-made-agricultural-farm-production-agricultural-products-68950181.jpg

It seems that we don’t have a qualified majority anymore, because Hungary has changed its vote. We have to understand why they do that, said Alain Maron, a regional climate minister for Belgium, as reported by The Associated Press.

The European Commission had already previously weakened environmental regulations, including the proposed nature restoration law, because of the protests.

Laws on sustainable farm practices, such as crop rotation and reduced use of pesticides, have been weakened or scrapped altogether, the Associated Press reported earlier this month.

https://media.licdn.com/dms/image/C4E12AQHBsW_oBhmODg/article-cover_image-shrink_720_1280/0/1569503002075?e=2147483647&v=beta&t=KPhoHVgAILw4LWfDl8-TjcDhguZcBrr-y72IcdwnnZE
https://www.fao.org/typo3temp/pics/654cc0c6f7.jpg
https://www.touteleurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/agriculture-biologique-dans-l-ue.png

The agricultural sector is a very important sector, not only in Hungary, but everywhere in Europe, said Anikó Raisz, Minister of State for Environmental Policy and Circular Economy of Hungary, as reported by Reuters.

The decision to cancel the vote to pass the nature restoration law also comes ahead of elections for the European Parliament that are to take place this June, 2024.

According to the European Parliament, about 80% of EU habitats are in poor condition. The bill would have worked to restoring 90% of these degraded habitats to a good condition as well as enacting protections to prevent further degradation.

https://www.arc2020.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/autumn-2930228_960_720-heronby-thomas-wolter.jpg

We condemn all Member States who are not supporting the law — at best, it suggests a deep failure to understand the situation we are in and what it means for the rights of citizens, the #RestoreNature coalition, which includes BirdLife Europe, ClientEarth, European Environmental Bureau (EEB) and World Wildlife Fund (WWF)-EU, shared in a statement.

An online public forum on the law in 2021 showed overwhelming support from over 110,000 people and organizations, according to Carbon Brief. The law was agreed upon in November 2023 and passed a European Parliament vote in February 2024.

The vote that had been planned for Monday was to formally adopt the law via the European Council.

This final step is typically considered a formality; however, in the case of the nature restoration law, environmentalists are concerned over whether it will come to vote again at all.

The #RestoreNature coalition is calling for lawmakers to adopt the law before the EU Parliament takes its summer recess.

Eco Watch / ABC Flash Point News 2024.