The birth of Jesus Christ is commemorated by millions of people around the world with Christmas celebrations on Dec. 25. Yet, most scholars agree that he wasn’t born on that day, or even in the year A.D. 1.
Researchers have speculated that the Roman Catholic Church chose Dec. 25 because it ties in with the winter solstice and Saturnalia, a festival dedicated to the Roman deity Saturn.

The church could also co-opt this popular pagan festival, as well as the winter celebration of other pagan religions, by choosing this day to celebrate Jesus’ birthday, according to scholar Ignacio L. Götz in his book Jesus the Jew: Reality, Politics, and Myth-A Personal Encounter (Christian Faith Publishing, 2019).
However, nobody really knows exactly when Jesus was born.
Some scholars believe that he was born between 6 B.C. and 4 B.C., based partly on the biblical story of King Herod the Great.
In an attempt to kill Jesus, the king allegedly ordered the death of all male infants under the age of 2 who lived in the vicinity of Bethlehem, an event known as the Massacre of the Innocents.
This occurred shortly before Herod’s own demise, a date which is still disputed. However, most scholars, including Peter Richardson and Amy Marie Fisher in their book Herod: King of the Jews and Friend of the Romans: Second edition (Routledge, 2018), follow the date used by Roman historians, who believed that Herod died in 4 B.C.

But historians disagree about Herod’s actual year of death, and many have argued that the mass infanticide is nothing more than a legend.
In his book Zealot: The Life and Times of Jesus of Nazareth (Random House, 2013), biblical scholar and author Reza Aslan wrote that Herod’s massacre was an event for which there exists not a shred of corroborating evidence in any chronicle or history of the time whether Jewish, Christian, or Roman.


Other scholars have attempted to correlate the Star of Bethlehem, which supposedly heralded Jesus’ birth, with actual astronomical events to pinpoint his birth year.
For example, in a 1991 article in the Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, astronomer Colin Humphreys proposed that the fabled star was actually a slow-moving comet, which Chinese observers recorded in 5 B.C.
However, Humphreys’ theory has since been debunked. Computer calculations of the previous stars in those days point at the planet Jupiter.

The month of Jesus’ birth has also been a point of debate, with one theory suggesting that the Star of Bethlehem may have been Venus and Jupiter coming together to form a bright light in the sky, a rare event that occurred in June of 2 B.C.
Another possibility is a similar conjunction between Saturn and Jupiter, which occurred in October of 7 B.C. There has also been speculation that Jesus was a spring baby.
Götz suggests that Jesus could have been born in the late spring of the year because pregnancies began in the fall after the harvests were in and there was enough money for a wedding feast.
Live Science / ABC Flash Point News 2024.
The position of the Star of Bethlehem (Jupiter) explains it all. Now computer models are able to date back in time and determine the position of Jupiter to analyze the religious adventure.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Three so-called religions, Muslims, Jews and Christians all have the same father Abraham in their believes, but still oppose one and other?
LikeLiked by 1 person